This week I watched the 2015 film Ride, not knowing anything about the film prior, as each movie discussed in these blogs are simply random picks of the day. The acting and
storyline itself really impressed me. The plot was very light and relatable: Angelo,
a talented young writer who has pressuring disputes with his single workaholic
mother Jackie, moves across the country to pursue a life of surf over
school…without his mother’s permission. He challenges his mother to live the
lifestyle he is in California, saying she wouldn’t be able to last. The two
struggle through their new location and their relationships. Though, there were
twists, such as there had been a loss of a second child contributing to the
mother’s governing lifestyle. What doesn’t catch me about the movie, though, is
the camera shots, and style as a narrative.
In an article titled “Editing For Subtext:
Altering the Meaning of the Narrative”, author Kenneth Dancyger says it
best: “Editing is all about telling the story with images and sounds, just as
screenwriting is telling the story with words, and directing is telling the
story with performance and camera. Editing can have straightforward goals or
less straightforward goals.” This film has straightforward goals.
The overall movie takes a very classic narrative style with
the basics of filmmaking coming into play. Many of the shots are over the
shoulder and framed to follow the 180-degree rule in film; there are many alternating
shots as there are many conversations between our characters. With this,
naturally the rule of thirds is often times present. Much of the film is shot
this way, very straightforward and simple. Unlike our last film discussed
(Absence), the style is effortless to the audience’s focus in on the characters
actions and relationships. It’s as simple as that…for the most part.
![]() |
| An example of a basic over the shoulder shot used throughout the film. |
There are also many establishing shots of the beach, where
most of this movie is focused on. Jackie is challenged by her son, who she
follows to California from New York after finding out he dropped out of NYU
(which he psychically shows us is 85 steps away from home), that she wouldn’t
be able to do the one thing he enjoys – surf. She thinks the whole laid back
California lifestyle is debauchery and pointless, as he’s throwing away his
great talent of writing and storytelling. Throughout the film, we find Jackie
facing a battle with a surfboard, but even so, many of those shots are not very
“out-there”. They are simple shots of her standing in the rule of thirds and
the ocean behind her. To me, that’s a typical shot – it’s pleasing to the eye
and passively frank.
What I am going discuss are the few frames that I found
quite interesting and the genuine focus of my blog – the unique scenes where
the camera angle is furthering the plot and contributing to the overall
narrative. Many of the examples I am going to show are reinforcing the
character’s relationships.
For example, in the pictured scene below, which is the first
“face-to-face” interaction we see between Jackie and Angelo, isn’t actually
face-to-face. Jackie is looking at her son who is standing behind her, through
the mirror, glancing between him and her laptop. She could have easily turned
around to face him, but instead they argued facing the same direction. This
easily symbolizes their relationship. She doesn’t really take the time to
really face her son and bond with him to fully understand him on a non-writer
level, because as we later learn, the loss of her second son was due to her
being busy with work. She engulfs herself in her work as a mask, so it takes
away from her personal relationships. This is another instance, because they
are talking about Angelo’s book and a better ending, this is a business talk
rather than a parental talk, so the facing each other would be too forward. If
she keeps it writer related then she can do no harm as a parent, as she is
paying him the time of bettering him in the way of a writer. All in all, we see
at first glance there is a disconnect between the two, and it is Jackie who is
at the root of it.
This may distantly connect to a quote from Dancyger’s
article again, but it is a connection no less: “We may not know the character
we are watching, but we sense the danger he has placed himself in. The lack of
reactions from other humans or animate beings emphasize his aloneness.”
(Dancyger). While he is analyzing the film There
Will Be Blood, this can relate back to Ride
in the sense that at that mirror moment, we don’t know our character Jackie, or
Angelo. But we sense the situation she has placed herself in in her life. We
sense the distance and tension between the two characters as they argue for the
book’s sake and Angelo’s sake, as he mentions that in his writing he feels like
he’s shit. After that is said, Jackie finally turns around in her seat to
authentically face him. She firmly yet calmly tells him that he is the least
shitty person she knows. She then turns around to face the laptop again. He then
asks why he feels so shitty. She congratulates him (a business disconnect,
again) on being a writer. The point is, we don’t know Jackie be we know her in
this moment to be stern yet caring for her only son. In this case, the presence
of Angelo’s reaction towards her emphasize and validates the traits we see in
her. Though, we are unsure whether she is always like this or is this is just
attitude towards her son.
Another great shot that echoes the same distance between the
two is the one below. Here Jackie has followed Angelo to California, where he
then wants nothing to do with her because of the suffocation. Jackie, her
driver, and a man turned love interest helping her learn to surf stalkingly sit
at the table next to her son, pretending to coincidentally run into him. They
exchange few words outside of ‘hello’ and remain facing with their backs toward
each other. Their bodies and surroundings are symmetrical and parallel but
their relationship remains off-putting and unbalanced. In this scene, it’s as
if Angelo and Jackie are just two strangers. It’s heartbreaking, really.
Dancyger’s article mostly focuses on editing and camera cuts
in postproduction as a means of subtext and underlying meaning (in war and
action movies). While that is not my main focus throughout this blog, I noticed something from postproduction. In terms
of color, this film is very aesthetically pleasing, at least to me. The alternations in hue
and color are what I picture to be a summer in California to look like, as sepia
tones takes over any hint of sky and sand throughout. This alteration undoubtedly
adds to the summer vibe, which is a subtext. As the families
relationship unfolds and the two main characters eventually come to a good
place in the resolution, the muted earth tones and brighter colors bring a
certain sense of nostalgia or longing in my gut, as I would love to give up all
responsibility to move to the West coast to pursue a life in unattached creative
writing and surf, as Angelo has. Every last detail, even down to the movies filter in color and saturation, is on purpose and adds to the emotions the audience is to feel. For me, that is the feeling of longing.
There are a couple of other sequences that contribute to the narration.
One is Jackie on the board and facing a wave, after many previous comically failed attempts. The camera in the water acts as a wave, as we crash into the determined mother. We (the wave) are the barrier between her son and her's understanding, but Jackie faces us head on, as the wave engulfs her. She continues to fight for her son. Though, after that first almost successful try, she lies in the sand, parallel to the ocean, defeated. Though, in between these two cuts, we study Jackie underwater as she freely wails her body as the tide controls her. She is not in control and we realize maybe that is what she needs. Maybe that is the beauty of surfing for Angelo; when successful on the board, he is in control of himself and his life.
This movie is simple/classic in terms of few unique shot variations, though the simplicity works. We are to focus on the mother-son relationship through actions and internal struggles of our characters, and basic rules of film are what fit most. When there are shot variations and styled frames, such as the two arguing through the mirror, it contributes to the disconnection and lack of understanding in their relationship. We root for both Jackie and Angelo, as a mother only wants whats best for her son (college, a career, goals, love), as she has already lost one son and her husband because of that loss.
Through Kenneth Dancyger's article “Editing For Subtext: Altering the Meaning of the Narrative” we understand the presence of subtext through it being hidden in shot variations. I hope my audience is becoming aware of this, as I know I am learning a lot.
Works Cited:
Dancyger, Kenneth. "Editing For Subtext: Altering The Meaning Of The Narrative."Cineaste 34.2 (2009): 38-42.




No comments:
Post a Comment